edu.ucar.opensky::articles:42863 UCAR/NCAR - Library OpenSky Support PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307-3000 opensky@ucar.edu http://opensky.ucar.edu/ homepage pointOfContact 2025-12-24T17:55:28.456598 ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata - Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded Data ISO 19115-2:2009(E) https://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7891b7c https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14851532 https Related Software #1 geq-pku/smartphone-pressure: Smartphone pressure reasearch final version Bias correction and application of labeled smartphone pressure data for evaluating the best track of landfalling tropical cyclones 2025-02-14T00:00:00Z publication https://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7891b7c https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-829-2025 Qiao, G. author Cao, Y. author Zhang, Q. author Sun, Juanzhen author Yu, H. author Bai, L. author UCAR/NCAR - Library publisher Smartphone pressure observations have demonstrated significant potential to complement traditional pressure monitoring. However, challenges remain in correcting biases and further leveraging these observations for practical applications. In this study, we used tropical cyclones (TCs) Lekima in 2019, Hagupit in 2020 and In-fa in 2021 as examples to conduct bias correction on labeled smartphone pressure data from the Moji Weather app. We propose a quality control procedure utilizing random forest machine learning models. By applying this quality control approach to the selected TCs, we discovered that the performance of the method for labeled data significantly surpassed that for unlabeled data developed in a previous study, reducing the mean absolute error from 3.105 to 0.904 hPa. The bias-corrected smartphone data were then supplemented with weather station data for sea-level-pressure analyses and compared with the analyses that used only weather station data. The significantly higher spatial resolution and broader coverage of the smartphone data led to notable differences between the two analysis fields. Additionally, we compared the minimum sea-level pressure of TCs derived from smartphone data, weather station observations and the best-track dataset from the Shanghai Typhoon Institute (STI) of the China Meteorological Administration. We found that the best track published by STI consistently underestimated the minimum sea-level pressure, with a median difference of 0.51 hPa in the three TC cases. UCAR/NCAR - Library OpenSky Support PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307-3000 opensky@ucar.edu http://opensky.ucar.edu/ homepage pointOfContact PDF Text theme Resource Type 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z publication <span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10pt;font-style:normal;" data-sheets-root="1">Copyright author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</span> None eng geoscientificInformation