edu.ucar.opensky::articles:42419 UCAR/NCAR - Library OpenSky Support PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307-3000 opensky@ucar.edu http://opensky.ucar.edu/ homepage pointOfContact 2025-12-24T17:59:59.878491 ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata - Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded Data ISO 19115-2:2009(E) http://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7st7v7p https://doi.org/10.11582/2019.00007 https Related Dataset #1 Idealized geoengineering SAI with NorESM https://doi.org/10.11582/2023.00004 https Related Dataset #2 Selected NorESM1-ME data from EXPECT project https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13905902 https Related Dataset #3 Data and Code for "Informative risk analyses of radiative forcing geoengineering require proper counterfactuals" Informative risk analyses of radiative forcing geoengineering require proper counterfactuals 2024-12-01T00:00:00Z publication http://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7st7v7p https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01881-y Lee, Walker author Diamond, M. S. author Irvine, P. author Reynolds, J. L. author Visioni, D. author UCAR/NCAR - Library publisher <p><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width:0px;background-color:oklch(0.99 0.004 106.471);color:oklch(0.304 0.04 213.681);display:inline !important;float:none;font-family:__fkGroteskNeue_598ab8, __fkGroteskNeue_Fallback_598ab8, ui-sans-serif, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, Roboto, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Arial, &quot;Noto Sans&quot;, sans-serif, &quot;Apple Color Emoji&quot;, &quot;Segoe UI Emoji&quot;, &quot;Segoe UI Symbol&quot;, &quot;Noto Color Emoji&quot;;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;orphans:2;text-align:start;text-decoration-color:initial;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-thickness:initial;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;widows:2;word-spacing:0px;">This critique of the study by Müller et al. examines the implications of radiative forcing geoengineering on Arctic wildfires and permafrost thaw. The authors argue that while Müller et al. assert that geoengineering increases these risks, their findings actually indicate a reduction in risk compared to high-emission scenarios (RCP8.5), albeit less effectively than targeted emissions reductions (RCP4.5). Key concerns include the inappropriate baseline comparison used in the study, which mischaracterizes the effectiveness of geoengineering interventions, and the limited scope of geoengineering strategies considered, potentially leading to overgeneralizations. The critique emphasizes the necessity for accurate framing and communication of geoengineering's potential impacts to avoid misinterpretation and to inform climate response strategies effectively.</span></p> UCAR/NCAR - Library OpenSky Support PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307-3000 opensky@ucar.edu http://opensky.ucar.edu/ homepage pointOfContact PDF Text theme Resource Type 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z publication <span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10pt;font-style:normal;" data-sheets-root="1">Copyright author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</span> None eng geoscientificInformation