Comparison between non‐orographic gravity‐wave parameterizations used in QBOi models and Strateole 2 constant‐level balloons

Gravity‐wave (GW) parameterizations from 12 general circulation models (GCMs) participating in the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation initiative (QBOi) are compared with Strateole 2 balloon observations made in the tropical lower stratosphere from November 2019–February 2020 (phase 1) and from October 2021–January 2022 (phase 2). The parameterizations employ the three standard techniques used in GCMs to represent subgrid‐scale non‐orographic GWs, namely the two globally spectral techniques developed by Warner and McIntyre (1999) and Hines (1997), as well as the “multiwaves” approaches following the work of Lindzen (1981). The input meteorological fields necessary to run the parameterizations offline are extracted from the ERA5 reanalysis and correspond to the meteorological conditions found underneath the balloons. In general, there is fair agreement between amplitudes derived from measurements for waves with periods less than  h and parameterizations. The correlation between the daily observations and the corresponding results of the parameterization can be around 0.4, which is significant, since 1200 days of observations are used. Given that the parameterizations have only been tuned to produce a quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) in the models, the 0.4 correlation coefficient of the GW momentum fluxes is surprisingly good. These correlations nevertheless vary between schemes and depend little on their formulation (globally spectral versus multiwaves for instance). We therefore attribute these correlations to dynamical filtering, which all schemes take into account, whereas only a few relate the gravity waves to their sources. Statistically significant correlations are mostly found for eastward‐propagating waves, which may be due to the fact that during both Strateole 2 phases the QBO is easterly at the altitude of the balloon flights. We also found that the probability density functions (pdfs) of the momentum fluxes are represented better in spectral schemes with constant sources than in schemes (“spectral” or “multiwaves”) that relate GWs only to their convective sources.

To Access Resource:

Questions? Email Resource Support Contact:

  • opensky@ucar.edu
    UCAR/NCAR - Library

Resource Type publication
Temporal Range Begin N/A
Temporal Range End N/A
Temporal Resolution N/A
Bounding Box North Lat N/A
Bounding Box South Lat N/A
Bounding Box West Long N/A
Bounding Box East Long N/A
Spatial Representation N/A
Spatial Resolution N/A
Related Links N/A
Additional Information N/A
Resource Format PDF
Standardized Resource Format PDF
Asset Size N/A
Legal Constraints

Copyright author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Access Constraints None
Software Implementation Language N/A

Resource Support Name N/A
Resource Support Email opensky@ucar.edu
Resource Support Organization UCAR/NCAR - Library
Distributor N/A
Metadata Contact Name N/A
Metadata Contact Email opensky@ucar.edu
Metadata Contact Organization UCAR/NCAR - Library

Author Lott, F.
Rani, R.
McLandress, C.
Podglajen, A.
Bushell, A.
Bramberger, M.
Lee, H.
Alexander, J.
Anstey, J.
Chun, H.
Hertzog, A.
Butchart, N.
Kim, Y.
Kawatani, Y.
Legras, B.
Manzini, E.
Naoe, H.
Osprey, S.
Plougonven, R.
Pohlmann, H.
Richter, Jadwiga H.
Scinocca, J.
García‐Serrano, J.
Serva, F.
Stockdale, T.
Versick, S.
Watanabe, S.
Yoshida, K.
Publisher UCAR/NCAR - Library
Publication Date 2024-07-01T00:00:00
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) Not Assigned
Alternate Identifier N/A
Resource Version N/A
Topic Category geoscientificInformation
Progress N/A
Metadata Date 2025-07-10T20:00:44.474546
Metadata Record Identifier edu.ucar.opensky::articles:42300
Metadata Language eng; USA
Suggested Citation Lott, F., Rani, R., McLandress, C., Podglajen, A., Bushell, A., Bramberger, M., Lee, H., Alexander, J., Anstey, J., Chun, H., Hertzog, A., Butchart, N., Kim, Y., Kawatani, Y., Legras, B., Manzini, E., Naoe, H., Osprey, S., Plougonven, R., Pohlmann, H., Richter, Jadwiga H., Scinocca, J., García‐Serrano, J., Serva, F., Stockdale, T., Versick, S., Watanabe, S., Yoshida, K.. (2024). Comparison between non‐orographic gravity‐wave parameterizations used in QBOi models and Strateole 2 constant‐level balloons. UCAR/NCAR - Library. https://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7q81jbw. Accessed 11 August 2025.

Harvest Source