Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations?

The Arctic freshwater (FW) has been the focus of many modeling studies, due to the potential impact of Arctic FW on the deep water formation in the North Atlantic. A comparison of the hindcasts from ten ocean-sea ice models shows that the simulation of the Arctic FW budget is quite different in the investigated models. While they agree on the general sink and source terms of the Arctic FW budget, the long-term means as well as the variability of the FW export vary among models. The best model-to-model agreement is found for the interannual and seasonal variability of the solid FW export and the solid FW storage, which also agree well with observations. For the interannual and seasonal variability of the liquid FW export, the agreement among models is better for the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) than for Fram Strait. The reason for this is that models are more consistent in simulating volume flux anomalies than salinity anomalies and volume-flux anomalies dominate the liquid FW export variability in the CAA but not in Fram Strait. The seasonal cycle of the liquid FW export generally shows a better agreement among models than the interannual variability, and compared to observations the models capture the seasonality of the liquid FW export rather well. In order to improve future simulations of the Arctic FW budget, the simulation of the salinity field needs to be improved, so that model results on the variability of the liquid FW export and storage become more robust.

To Access Resource:

Questions? Email Resource Support Contact:

  • opensky@ucar.edu
    UCAR/NCAR - Library

Resource Type publication
Temporal Range Begin N/A
Temporal Range End N/A
Temporal Resolution N/A
Bounding Box North Lat N/A
Bounding Box South Lat N/A
Bounding Box West Long N/A
Bounding Box East Long N/A
Spatial Representation N/A
Spatial Resolution N/A
Related Links N/A
Additional Information N/A
Resource Format PDF
Standardized Resource Format PDF
Asset Size N/A
Legal Constraints

Copyright 2012 American Geophysical Union.


Access Constraints None
Software Implementation Language N/A

Resource Support Name N/A
Resource Support Email opensky@ucar.edu
Resource Support Organization UCAR/NCAR - Library
Distributor N/A
Metadata Contact Name N/A
Metadata Contact Email opensky@ucar.edu
Metadata Contact Organization UCAR/NCAR - Library

Author Jahn, Alexandra
Aksenov, Y.
de Cuevas, B.
de Steur, L.
Häkkinen, S.
Hansen, E.
Herbaut, C.
Houssais, M.-N.
Karcher, M.
Kauker, F.
Lique, C.
Nguyen, A.
Pemberton, P.
Worthen, D.
Zhang, J.
Publisher UCAR/NCAR - Library
Publication Date 2012-08-10T00:00:00
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) Not Assigned
Alternate Identifier N/A
Resource Version N/A
Topic Category geoscientificInformation
Progress N/A
Metadata Date 2023-08-18T18:26:29.336197
Metadata Record Identifier edu.ucar.opensky::articles:12279
Metadata Language eng; USA
Suggested Citation Jahn, Alexandra, Aksenov, Y., de Cuevas, B., de Steur, L., Häkkinen, S., Hansen, E., Herbaut, C., Houssais, M.-N., Karcher, M., Kauker, F., Lique, C., Nguyen, A., Pemberton, P., Worthen, D., Zhang, J.. (2012). Arctic Ocean freshwater: How robust are model simulations?. UCAR/NCAR - Library. http://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7m32wjf. Accessed 12 February 2025.

Harvest Source