Comparison of thermodynamic retrieval by the adjoint method with the traditional retrieval method

The adjoint technique for retrieval of the thermodynamic fields is compared with the traditional technique of Gal-Chen and Hane. The comparison is performed using both Doppler radar observations and simulated data. The real dataset is a gust-front case observed during the Phoenix II experiment. The simulated data are from a numerical experiment of a collapsing cold pool. In the simulated data study, we assume that observations of the horizontal velocity are available, either from a dual-Doppler synthesis or from a single-Doppler retrieval. Tests are performed on data that have been degraded in various ways to replicate real data. These tests include the sensitivity to the temporal sampling frequency, random error, spatially correlated error, and divergent/rotational error in the forcing terms. In most of the cases examined, it is found that the adjoint method is able to retrieve the buoyancy field more accurately than the traditional technique.

To Access Resource:

Questions? Email Resource Support Contact:

  • opensky@ucar.edu
    UCAR/NCAR - Library

Resource Type publication
Temporal Range Begin N/A
Temporal Range End N/A
Temporal Resolution N/A
Bounding Box North Lat N/A
Bounding Box South Lat N/A
Bounding Box West Long N/A
Bounding Box East Long N/A
Spatial Representation N/A
Spatial Resolution N/A
Related Links N/A
Additional Information N/A
Resource Format PDF
Standardized Resource Format PDF
Asset Size N/A
Legal Constraints

Copyright 1996 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Act (17 USC ยง108, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the AMS's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statement, requires written permission or a license form the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policy, available on the AMS Web site located at (http://www.ametsoc.org/AMS) or from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or copyright@ametsoc.org


Access Constraints None
Software Implementation Language N/A

Resource Support Name N/A
Resource Support Email opensky@ucar.edu
Resource Support Organization UCAR/NCAR - Library
Distributor N/A
Metadata Contact Name N/A
Metadata Contact Email opensky@ucar.edu
Metadata Contact Organization UCAR/NCAR - Library

Author Sun, Juanzhen
Crook, Andrew
Publisher UCAR/NCAR - Library
Publication Date 1996-02-01T00:00:00
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) Not Assigned
Alternate Identifier N/A
Resource Version N/A
Topic Category geoscientificInformation
Progress N/A
Metadata Date 2025-07-17T17:57:04.983647
Metadata Record Identifier edu.ucar.opensky::articles:3304
Metadata Language eng; USA
Suggested Citation Sun, Juanzhen, Crook, Andrew. (1996). Comparison of thermodynamic retrieval by the adjoint method with the traditional retrieval method. UCAR/NCAR - Library. https://n2t.org/ark:/85065/d7ft8kvq. Accessed 10 August 2025.

Harvest Source